Confidential Reports
 
Advertise Here Advertise Here
     
Home
|
Safety Database
|
Skydiving Directory
|
Rigging
|
Instructors
|
Skydivers
|
Classified Ads
|
Forums
|
Contact Us
     
 

Advertise Here

This is a small selection from past reports, we will be adding more as time allows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Glider Air Miss

A 4 way training dive took place on a warm summer afternoon with significant thermal activity; there was scattered cloud (1 2 eighths) at around 6,000ft, otherwise, visibility was fine. At between 5,000 and 6,000ft the 4 way group narrowly missed colliding with a soaring glider; separation was estimated at 30 meters. The glider was recorded on air to air video but was not identified. It was within 300 metres of the drop zone.

Comment: The glider should not have been there, but jumpers should be aware that gliders are not required to have radio or navigational facilities. Nearly all operate under Visual Flight Rules, though, which means they should never enter cloud. Given this, and despite the presence of some cloud at that altitude, it is surprising that it was not seen either by DZ control or the jumpmaster.

Conclusion: Most jumpers will admit privately that they don't always look as thoroughly as they should. And it is a fact that we often see what we expect to see, and conversely, may not see what we don't expect to see. This could easily have been a multiple fatality; DZ controllers and jumpmaster's must be aware of the need to make sure it really is 'clear to drop'.

Stand Up Deployment

A Category 9 AFF graduate was on a solo descent and attempted a 'stand up' in freefall. As he did so, his main parachute deployed. He landed successfully.

Comment: It is impossible to be certain what happened even the jumper's recollection is often faulty in such cases but it is assumed that turbulence at the base of the container pulled out the pilot chute, which (though not specifically stated in the report) was presumably a bottom of container (BOC) type.

Conclusion: The conclusion locally was that jumpers should not do stand ups when using throwaway pilot chutes, but this seems rather sweeping! It is more likely that the pilot chute was already deployed as a result of either packing error or disturbance in the plane or at exit. However, BOC deployment is relatively new and free stylists ( and sit flyers) should perhaps consider an extra pre exit check.

Handle in Tow

A fairly recent D licence jumper did a solo cloud base descent from 3,500ft wearing a rig with pullout deployment. At pull time he lost the pad; the pin had in fact been extracted but the pilot chute was still on the container and failed to inflate in the 'burble'. After an unsuccessful attempt to reach for the pilot chute or handle, he cut away, pulled his reserve handle and landed safely under his reserve.

Comment: Some jumpers strongly maintain you can retrieve a handle in tow, but this is at least difficult, and is complicated by the fact that you have no way of knowing how far deployment has proceeded, or indeed whether something else is stopping deployment. A more experienced jumper might have tried a steeper body position to try to sweep the pilot chute out, but then you could go on trying that for the rest of your life!

Conclusion: Jumpers using pullout should regularly consider what they would do in such a situation, which can happen to anybody. Some jumpers still dispute whether you should cut away before pulling your reserve but most would say yes and in this case, with the pin out, the shock of the reserve opening might well have inflated the main into the reserve.

Low Hook Turns

In separate incidents at two different drop zones, jumpers attempted late turns into wind when too low. One landed on his side and was fortunate to suffer only heavy bruising. The other suffered multiple injuries including fractures to vertebrae, pelvis and ribs. Both were very experienced, one exceptionally so and both were under very high performance canopies.

Comment: In both cases the reported weather was perfect; there should have been no problem landing safely. On the other hand, high spirits after a good dive on a lovely day are just the sort of factors that lead to this sort of display

Conclusion: The dangers of radical maneuvers near the ground, particularly under 'hot' canopies, are well documented and have been the subject of a BPA poster campaign, but jumpers continue to risk injury or death for no good reason. It has to be said that experienced jumpers including some instructors and even CCls, are often culprits. Not surprising that lesser mortals try to emulate them.

Power Line Landing

A Category 10, C licence holder was making an early morning balloon jump in ideal conditions near, but not into, a major DZ. On final approach the canopy hit a set of high tension cables and finished up wrapped round one of the cables by the pilot chute. The jumper was unhurt.

Comment: Though not stated, this was probably the jumper’s first experience of jumping outside the protected environment of a parachute ,club. She was lucky. Balloons Rive jumpers limited control over their spot; but the same problem applies to anyone who finds they have left the plane at the wrong place. We all get (or give) bad spots sometimes. And power cables, particularly 11km ones, are notoriously hard to see from the air.

Conclusion: When 'away from home' jumpers must pay special attention to picking a suitable and safe place to land and this process must start high. Initially it is hard to read terrain from altitude but with practice you can learn to interpret all available information for a better picture. The Operations Manual states it is usually better to take a crosswind or downwind landing than to risk hitting a hazard. You might also take a tip from many experienced display jumpers: just before emplaning, check where the wind is coming from and relate it to the position of the sun. That way you always know which way to land one less thing to worry about.

Who Needs Brakes ?

A very experienced jumper suffered a premature 'firing' of his brake line on deployment, which completely locked the brake on that side. He landed uneventfully.

Conclusion: Many students remain unaware that it is perfectly possible to fly and land even a 'hot' canopy (which this was) safely and comfortably without brakes. Once confident under canopy, all jumpers should consider making one or two jumps using riser control only. Consult your instructor or CCI for a brief; and make sure you are aware that there is a considerable difference between back and front riser control the latter is radical and can be dangerous in inexperienced hands.

Broken Lines

A highly experienced jumper had a hard opening on an F111 canopy, resulting in one snapped line. Having decided the canopy was flyable, the jumper elected to land it. At about 600 feet a second line snapped. The resulting hard landing caused Injuries to his foot and ankle resulting in a trip to the local hospital. A similar report had another very experienced Jumper electing to fly a canopy with two 'A' lines snapped. At flare height, the canopy collapsed and this jumper ended up with three chipped vertebrae and a fractured pelvis.

Conclusions: The obvious conclusion to be drawn is that these were (with hindsight) the wrong decisions. There is always the temptation to stay with all those remaining lines and ignore the fact that one or two have snapped. I have several more reports of broken lines and damaged canopies this season, the difference is that all the others are 'merely' malfunctions whilst these two, sadly, became injury reports. However most line breaks are caused by hard, off heading openings or something cutting the lines on opening The cutting is often the grommets on the slider, and the slider grommets are usually dented or sharpened in the first place by hard impact with the connector links on previous jumps, or by poor maintenance.

Recommendations: Most modern high performance canopies with line damage will let you know in no uncertain terms that they are not even flyable, let alone landable. Older F111 canopies can be a little more misleading. They may appear to be quite controllable with a few lines damaged. The decision about what to do is a judgment call. All BPA courses have guidelines on helping you make this decision, give this situation some thought and if you are not sure on how to decide, ask your Chief Instructor. Most line breaks can be prevented with a little planning. Question your openings, if you consistently get hard, off heading openings then you need some packing tuition. Inspect your lines and slider grommets on a regular basis, the main area of ram air broken lines is at the connector links, normally the outside lines and also at the cascaded points. Talk to your rigger on how you can reduce line wear on your particular system.

Shoddy Rigging

During a routine reserve inspection and repack a rigger found that the reserve pilot chute had previously been used as a main pilot chute for a few hundred jumps at least and was In general bad condition.

Conclusions: The reserve system is a skydiver's last chance and the pilot chute is the device that makes it possible. By using a reserve pilot chute with deteriorated porosity, the packer is reducing the skydiver's possibilities of surviving a malfunction.

Recommendations: The best thing to do here is find another reserve packer, there is no excuse for this type of situation, make sure your reserve packer e is conscientious enough to do a thorough inspection.

Soft Housings

At the time of writing there are a few Incidents being investigated with reference to soft housings on cutaway systems. Many sources around the world are reporting hard pulls of the cutaway handle during emergency procedures and there are some reports of one riser failing to separate causing main and reserve entanglements.

Conclusions: This potential problem has been reported on rigs that do not have a dedicated channel for the cutaway cable. For example some rigs with soft housings have a system where the cutaway cable is routed through a channel, which makes sure the cutaway is the same as with a hard housing. The rigs which are presenting some concern are those with soft housings which do not Imitate the mechanics of a hard housing system.

Recommendations: Some manufacturers are offering retrofit systems to convert from soft housings to hard housings on the cutaway system. If you have soft housings that are suspect or you would just like some reassurance then try this test on your system: fit the rig for normal use and set up the risers to suspend you as in a training harness, practice a normal cutaway and reserve pull as you would expect to do it in a live emergency. You may want to repeat this test for smaller zero porosity canopies and have some one assist you by pulling down on the harness to increase the tension, as a radical malfunction will greatly increase the tension.

Tandem Malfunctions

We have eleven reports of tandem malfunctions this month. Five of these were caused by knots in the lines preventing the slider from deploying all the way down; three of these had standard lines and two had microline. We have had four reports of lines breaking, all on microline. One reserve deployment during exit and one riser releasing during deployment.

Conclusions: Out of all these cutaways there is not one the same, ie, every broken line was in a different place and each description presents a different picture. However, the common factor with the broken lines is that they were all of a microline type. In the knotted lines cases, the knots were described very similarly and these have been reported many times before. Reference the riser that released, both Relative Workshop (Vector system) and Strong Enterprises have upgraded the RW 2 ring of the three ring system to strengthen them.

Recommendations: The best recommendation here is for tandem malfunction reports to be more in depth to assist in analysing and reporting them; ie describe the incident in detail as much as possible with as many facts as available, add the jumpmaster's conclusions and recommendations to assist with the collation and reporting. Most of the above reports are too broad to make recommendations on; however a lot of thought should be put into packing tandem canopies, especially the type and condition of the rubber bands for the nature of the lines being used.

Restricted Reserve Deployment

We have had three reports of reserve pilot chutes being restricted during deployment prior to a reserve inspection and repack, this is caused by packing the bridle line into the corners of the reserve container.

Conclusions: These reports were all on different rigs and it is interesting to note that none of the rig manuals demonstrated packing the bridle lines this way. Although in these cases the bridle restricted the pilot chutes from being extracted to the complete length required, the reserve deployment would probably have been fine had it been needed.

Recommendations: There is no need to put the bridle line into the comers so give this some thought. If in doubt, do a pull test and see how far the pilot chute launches, if the launch can be restricted by the bridle line then it is not correct.

Unnecessary Total Malfunction

A container had been converted to a BOC system, the jumper found they could not deploy the pilot chute as the pouch was too tight. The reserve was successfully deployed.

Conclusions: This malfunction was both preventable by the rigger who did the job and also by the owner who should have done a practice pull on the ground.

Recommendations: If you have your equipment modified or repaired and it involves moving handles then confirm the system by a simple practice as if you were converting to a new rig. Riggers should check the system before the customer even gets to the rig.

Classic Problems

We have had many reports of what I would call the traditional types; line over malfunctions, bag locks and line problems preventing the slider from deploying

Conclusions: Nearly all these incident reports have been described in a few words, eg "it was a line over malfunction so I cut away". The majority of the jumpers were experienced parachutists, it would be interesting to know how many of the canopies were pro packed, how many side packed. One report that I read some years ago put 70% of malfunctions down to poor pro packing techniques, I wonder

Recommendations : Good packing techniques would probably prevent many of these and the only recommendation that can be given is to read and understand the factors which can assist in preventing these common problems. The deployment system has been well proven, however the equipment is changing so fast that a bit of studying is required to keep up with the latest techniques. There is an art to good, safe pro packing and the understanding of your deployment system. The type and size of your pilot chute, the length of the bridle and the rubber bands you use all contribute and have to be compatible.

AAD´s Activating

There have been several reports throughout the season of Automatic Activation Devices firing. Some examples. One was sent back to the manufacturer, following a fault on the ground. It was found to be a unique error, i.e. the only time the error had ever occurred. One fired whilst the main ( square) canopy was in the second of two 360 turns. Another fired at altitude whilst the jumper was at terminal velocity, several thousand feet too high.

Conclusions:There are no patterns and trends in these reports as such, other than the fact that no-one was injured as a result of the firings, and that in all cases the units were returned to either manufacturers or maintenance facilities for inspection.

Recommendations:It is important to remember some key points about AAD operation. First and foremost they are a backup only, or a survival tool. Just like airbags, and safety belts, from time to time they will not perform as expected. The manufacturers must be informed of any situation where their product does something unexpected, so that they can spot any patterns of events which could indicate something more serious. Secondly, AADs must be operated as per their operating instructions. For example all FXCs should be ‘J’ modified by now. If they aren't, your breaking the law. The Student Cypres has two firing descent rates, one of them is 43 feet per second. The Cypres doesn't know that you've put it in a student piggybag system. It will just do it’s job if you descend faster than that rate through the firing altitude. Even a docile student square can exceed 43 feet per second after a couple of turns. All of this information can be found in the users manual.

Manufacturing Fault

After nearly a year of use , a jumper decided to query a problem with the main at the next repack. He asked the rigger to see if he could see anything wrong with the canopy, as it had always been very hard to pack. There did not appear to be anything wrong with it’s performance. The rigger instantly saw the problem. One ‘C’ line was a ‘staggering’ 27” longer than the others. On another occasion the lines attached to the canopy had no stitching on them and over a period of time the lines gradually became longer as they slipped out of the finger trapping causing the canopy to have a bad line trim.

Conclusions:The canopy must have been very strange to pack, and would almost certainly have flown with one line trailing slack all the time. This was a company test canopy and was not inspected and cleared to be used, It is remarkable that these incidents did not become malfunction reports, and the question which begs to be answered is, who rigged this canopy up in the first place ?

Recommendations:When assembling a set of kit remember that the inspection is just as important as the correct assembly, this does not just mean just attaching the canopy to risers and saying its good to go. When you first inspect a canopy inspect it for any manufacturing faults and after then its just a matter of concentrating on the general wear and tear and any accidental damage. Are you sure your system has been assembled and inspected correctly.

Temporary Repairs

During a routine reserve inspection and repack a rigger found a damaged reserve pilot chute that had been repaired with ripstop sticky tape (2 Patches), a freebag was damaged and also repaired with ripstop sticky tape (3 Patches) and the canopy was also damaged and repaired with ripstop sticky tape (1 Patch). This system was converted from a round reserve to a square reserve however there is no record of who had done the work.

Conclusions:All this damage was probably caused by bad packing techniques and the repairs were certainly not acceptable, this was the first time the owner had it repacked by a rigger as he normally does the repacks himself, the repairs have been on this system since he first started packing it.

Recommendations:This situation may have been acceptable many years ago however the sport is progressing very fast and keeping up to date is a full time task, consulting a rigger every now and then may be the answer here.

Compatibility

A chaser manufactured for a Foil main canopy had the Foil replaced with a sprint main canopy, The deployment bag was the original type made for a Foil with a large grommet ( size 8 ) in the base of the deployment bag, The Sprint main canopy was way to small for the container and most of the components were not compatible with each other for many different reasons.

Conclusions:The rigger who was asked to assemble obviously declined, in the best scenario the main canopy could have been pulled through the grommet in the deployment bag causing some damage, in the worst scenario this could have resulted in a reserve ride when the rest of the system was also badly mismatched ??

Recommendations:The system worked in this case and the equipment in question has not been assembled, however this is a lesson for all those who assemble equipment, lets not forget that even though components look similar the small differences can make a big difference. Its not just riggers who assemble equipment and this could have been missed.

Illegal Pack Job

During a routine equipment inspection prior to using this rig on a drop zone, the person inspecting the documents noticed that the paperwork had no information about having a Cypres installed however the rig did have a Cypres, on looking closure the inspector noticed the remarks “ Cypres Added “.

Conclusions:The person packing this reserve did so when it had no Cypres fitted, Its not surprising to find out that the person who later fitted the Cypres was not the reserve packer and he never signed that he fitted the Cypres probably hoping that every one would assume it was the reserve packer who later fitted it.

Recommendations:We have had similar incidents of people tampering with some one else's reserve pack jobs but this beats them all, Lets remember that no one can tamper with another persons reserve repack.

Baggy Clothing

An experienced jumper 2000+ jumps was doing a sit flying using a baggy nylon tracksuit, just before deployment the jacket inflated over the rig, on deployment the jumper had hold of the BOC toggle and part of the jacket, and in pulling the pilot chute ends up on the jumpers back tangled with the jacket, the jumper managed to clear the pilot chute but opens very slow.

Conclusions:We must assume that every thing we wear is classed as parachute equipment during any parachute descent and look at clothing as critical as we would with the rest of our equipment.

Recommendations:When using baggy tracksuits the type of material should be taken into consideration and how the top is secured. Check before emplaning to make sure nothing can affect the deployment sequence.

Pencil Packing

During a routine reserve inspection and repack, the rigger noticed that it had been packed twice before according to the documents, however he became suspicious when he noticed that the second repack done in the UK was exactly like the factory repack done in the USA by the rig manufacturer, the PD marking box on the canopy was unmarked.

Conclusions:After confronting the UK packer with this information he found out that this repack was only a pencil pack job as the rigger suspected.

Recommendations:Do not pencil pack reserve parachutes, this is a simple request but it has the backing of the BPA and all its powers to remove all BPA ratings so why risk it, and the word fraud also springs top mind.

Hard Reserve Pull

A reserve packer went to deploy a reserve prior to a reserve repack and found it difficult, he then decided to do a pull test and record the poundage, the result was a staggering 56Lbs

Conclusions:This reserve repack was done abroad who I believe do not have to record the poundage as we have to in the UK however they do work under the same guide lines of a maximum pull force of 22Lbs.

Recommendations:Just be aware that when your reserve is packed abroad the poundage is not tested after the reserve repack, which is mandatory in the UK.

Bad Packing

Since the last lot of incident reports we have had a total of 3 Bridle lines miss-routed and not picked up on flight line checks and 2 pin pull systems packed incorrectly, all five resulted in reserve rides.

Conclusions:This is a problem that continues to show itself on a regular basis, the only conclusions I can come up with is the packers are not paying attention to the pack job or the right information is not being taught to the jumpers on the rig that they now own, not all containers close the same way.

Recommendations:This is the easiest malfunction to prevent, please check your manuals for the correct closure sequence and if in doubt get some advice.Also flight line checkers should be aware of this problem to prevent skydivers from emplaning with a miss routed bridle line.

Incorrect Assembly

I have had 2 reports of main risers incorrectly assembled on to the containers that resulted in crossed risers on deployment, in both cases the jumpers had to cut away and deploy their reserves.

Conclusions:At first I would have said that the above risers must have been assembled to the containers without having a line sequence check prior to packing, however one was a category 8 jumper who had the line sequence checked by a experienced AFF Instructor.

Recommendations:The only recommendation here to be more observant and take your time when performing such a simple task, The word complaisant springs to mind yet again.

RSL Prematurely Deploys Reserve

Upon deployment of the main canopy, the reserve canopy also deployed, the jumper cut away the main and landed safely on the reserve parachute.

Conclusions:This rig had recently had an RSL fitted, unfortunately for the jumper the length of the RSL was to short on a Racer container so when the main risers came under tension the RSL pulled the reserve pins.

Recommendations:This premature reserve deployment could quite easily have been avoided if the rigger had taken more care when retrofitting the RSL system, this is also something that reserve packers should be looking out for.

Incorrect Reserve Repack

The RSL system on an Atom container is set up so that both risers have to be released before the RSL system deploys the reserve, the way that this is achieved is that both sides of the RSL have a separate pin and when packed, both of these pins have to be put through the reserve ripcord loop and into 2 separate loops, one system however was found to be packed with only one RSL pin being through the reserve ripcord loop.

Conclusions:The RSL system was still affective however if the jumper was to have a total malfunction on the main parachute then the reserve ripcord would not have deployed the reserve parachute and would have fatal consequences.

Recommendations:This type of incident demonstrates the need to continue to work logically and use the manufacturers manuals step by step, especially when the packer is not completely familiar with this type of deployment system, remember any small changes that you are not completely familiar with is only a phone call away.

Incorrect Risers

2 reports of Racer containers fitted with PDF reverse risers have been reported by the Australian parachute Federation, this is very worrying for the following reasons, firstly the reverse risers were designed for the Atom container which has a high mounted large riser ring and secondly they were installed on a Racer container which had a low mounted large riser ring.

Conclusions:The persons investigating these found that the risers could not be released unless the canopy was at least over head which is not always the case when confronted with a radical main canopy malfunction.

Recommendations:This is another case of mismatched equipment, Beware incompatible components can kill.

Quality of Riggers Materials

A jumper deployed his pin pull system and during deployment thought that it caught somewhere, on landing he noticed a small tear on the pilot chute netting and decided to get it checked out by the local rigger.

Conclusions:The rigger who inspected it found that the netting ripped very easily and grounded the pilot chute, this pilot chute had approximate. 40 jumps on it prior to this incident so the jumper decided to return it for inspection, because of the sequence of this incident the rigger who manufactured it tested some others that were in the same batch and found that the netting ripped with as little as 5Lbs of pressure. The source of the netting is not known.

Recommendations:Riggers who manufacture components need to be sure of the suppliers and that all materials have been tested to an approved standard.

Stability is Important

3 static line Raps students had very bad exits resulting in entanglement with the deploying canopy. One student managed to cutaway and land safely under the reserve, however the other 2 landed with both main and reserve, one resulted in injuries on landing and was taken to hospital.
2 AFF students went unstable on pull resulting in deploying canopy entangling with legs, both students cutaway and deployed reserve with no further problems

Conclusions Without a good exit or a good body position during deployment every student is automatically placed in a higher than normal risk bracket and these reports have shown the consequences that can be expected.

Recommendations Concentrating on the practical training given during courses can reduce these problems. Good exit training out of a mock up during ground training to improve techniques could prevent entanglements during static line exits.
When debriefing AFF students during the early jumps more concentration on the deployment position could improve later deployment when the students go solo. Students can help themselves by visualising themselves deploying stable in preparation for the jump

No Pull

2 students and 1 experienced jumpers failed to deploy the main parachute, as they could not find the toggle, they carried out reserve drills and landed without further incident. 1 experience jumper failed to deploy the main as the pin pull system jammed

Conclusions 3 reserve rides could have been prevented by either improving drills or a final check by the jumper that the toggle was in place prior to leaving the aircraft. The 4th was caused by bad packing and is a common problem with pin pulls

Recommendations Practice deploying the pilot chute while wearing a rig and building up the muscle memory so it’s becomes a natural action and always check your handles are in place prior to exiting the aircraft.
If using a pin pull the same applies as well as making sure it is packed with slack so that when pulling the pin you're not pulling any material

Premature Deployments

One experience jumper had a reserve deploy while standing up in the aircraft and 2 student Cypres fired while descending in the aircraft as the jump run was cancelled due to cloud

Conclusions The security of the reserve pin should not have been affected by moving so it was either knocked or the closure loop was to long. The student Cypres will fire if it descends faster than a deployed canopy and most aircraft's can achieve this. This could cause a catastrophic accident if the aircraft has no door or its open

Recommendations Check the security of the reserve pin prior to enplaning and if an aircraft has to land with jumpers on board inform the pilot that Cypres is on board so they can descend slowly and turn off affected AAD´s

Hard Openings

A camera jumper had a very hard opening and blacked out for a few seconds, this resulted in whiplash and a visit to hospital

Conclusions The stiletto is well know as a slow deploying parachute however a bad pack job can still cause it to open fast, its also worth remembering that some manufacturers have 2 slider sizes for the same canopy depending on how you like your openings

Recommendations Pack carefully especially when doing camera jumps also its common practice for camera jumpers not to look down on deployment as this can prevent whiplash

Twists

12 reserve rides due to twists on high performance canopies and 9 reserve rides due to twists on intermediate and student canopies

Conclusions Kicking out of twists on high performance canopies is not an option as they wind up very quickly, all these jumpers carried out good reserve drills however some did report having to use both hands to cutaway as it was very difficult.
The intermediate and student cutaway procedures were done after attempts were given to clear the twists, some never cleared and others cleared but caused further problems when doing control checks.
One jumper ended up on a round reserve having never practiced PLF's for over six years and it became quite a shock to end up under a round

Recommendations Body position, well fitted equipment, canopy packing and line stowage is the cause of most twists, insuring the use of correct bungee's, the correct size and adequate grip is probably the most important factor

Malfunctions (General)

3 jumpers had bag lock, 8 had line over's, 4 had pilot chute in tows, 2 could not release one control toggle, 2 had line knots, 2 had pilot chute over front of canopy. All did the correct reserve drills and landed without further incident

Conclusions Bad packing is without doubt the cause of most of these typical malfunctions

Recommendations Maybe a packing test should be given to all jumpers who have these type of malfunctions to see if the problem can be spotted and prevented by improving packing techniques and knowledge

Incorrect Drills

2 jumpers deployed the reserve without cutting away the malfunctioned main parachutes resulting in having 2 canopies out, one cutaway after the canopies went into a down plane and landed without further incident and the other landed with both parachutes very dazed

Conclusions When in an unnatural environment and suddenly faced with a high stress situation like a malfunction it is very important to rely on drills taught and in these cases the drills were not instinctive

Recommendations Make sure reserve drills are practiced regular and become very instinctive

Altitude Awareness

2 jumpers lost altitude awareness during a free fly jump, both realise and deployed however the Cypres also fired and both jumpers had 2 canopies out, both cutaway and landed under the reserve

Conclusions Its not mentioned weather they had any audible altimeter or not

Recommendations Regular check of your altimeter is the best safety tip however the purchase of a good audible altimeter as a back up is also a good idea, some free flyers have 2 audible altimeters

Bad Landings (Reserve parachute)

3 jumpers successfully carried out reserve drills after malfunctions and then had bad landings on the reserve parachutes resulting in injuries

Conclusions One jumper went from his 170 main to a 135 reserve, one went from a 220 main to a round reserve and the third had similar sized main and reserve

Recommendations Jumping a large main and having a small reserve is never a good idea, also having a round and not being prepared to end up on it is also not a good idea

www.Skydive-Safety.com © 2007